托福最终模板

综合口语模板(huge改

(120-145w)

T2

School Announcement:

  • In the reading, we know that the university has decided to … .

    (First, it claims that ….; Second, it will ….)

Letter/Email:

  • The student/professor in the letter/email suggests that the university should(/n’t) … for 2 reasons.

    First, … ; Second, ….

  • The woman/man in the conversation agrees/disagrees with the plan/letter for 2 reasons.

    First, she states that … ; The student points out that … .

    In addtion, she declares that … ; For example, she mentions … .

(Optional) That’s why she’s against/in favor of the plan/.

==================================================================================

(120-145w)

T3

  • In this set of material, the reading passage talks about (文章标题)… , which means (+定义句)

  • Well, in the XXX lecture, the professor used two examples to explain this concept.

    The first example is … .

    The second example given is … .

==================================================================================

(120-145w)

T4

  • The professor in the XXX lecture talks about XXX from 2 aspects.

    The first aspect/advantage/disadvantage/feature/benefit/reason is that … . For example, ….

    While, the second XXX is that …. . For example, ….

综合写作模板: vince

(around 300 words)

In the reading material, the author cites three reasons to support the viewpoint that (summary of reading intro). Nevertheless, the lecturer in the listening material argues that (summary of listening intro), and opposes the points in the reading material.

First and foremost, the author argues that (reading point 1 + flow of idea). However, the lecturer offers an opposite stand that (listening point 1 + details).

In addition, the lecturer casts doubt on the author’s another reason that (reading point 2 + flow of idea), demonstrating that (listening point 2 + details).

Finally, the author’s third reason that (reading point 3 + flow of idea) is also counteracted by the lecturer who points out that (listening point 3 + details).

An apparent divide exists between the author and the lecturer on the evaluation of (content).